Climate change is one of the greatest health threats of the 21st century and air pollution is the single largest environmental health risk, according to the World Health Organization. Simultaneously, noncommunicable diseases caused by exposure to harmful environments, constitute the fastest growing global health concerns. (1) While scientists worldwide preach about our growing need to shift to renewable energy, let’s take a moment to really understand the impact fossil fuels are having on the environment and our health. (2)
Here are 5 reasons fossil fuels are destroying mankind and the environment, and why renewable energy is the key to our survival.
Burning coal, crude oil, and natural gas instead of using solar energy lead to substantial air pollution. When coal is burned, sulfur dioxide is produced and these harmful emissions have been linked to respiratory problems such as asthma, congestion, and pulmonary inflammation. In fact, to put this global health concern into perspective, air pollution kills seven million people each year, with 9 out of 10 people breathing life-threatening air on a daily basis. When humans breathe in this polluted air, they will have an increased risk of stroke, heart disease chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, and acute respiratory infections. (3) If we were to switch to a renewable energy source such as solar energy, just imagine how many lives we could save!
You only have to think of recent oil spills, to see the devastating impact fossil fuels can have on sea life. On Feb 22, 2021, a mysterious oil spill was reported in the news off the coast of Israel. The Israeli government urged people to avoid 119 miles of coastline. Reuters reported that a whale had washed up dead on the Israeli coast and the National Sea Turtle Rescue Centre reported birds and sea turtles had been found covered in sticky tar. (4)
Apart from environmental destruction, let’s now consider fossil fuel water pollution and the impacts on human life. When fossil fuels are mined, the manufacturing process can disrupt the environment and cause water pollution, as chemicals and manufacturing bi-products run into streams, lakes, rivers, and the sea. When waterways, water sources, and groundwater are contaminated with heavy metals, radioactive materials, and other pollutants, this can cause serious and life-threatening conditions. From cancer and birth defects to neurological damage. (5)
The truth is, if we continue to rely on fossil fuels, you might as well wave goodbye to polar bears, whales, and seals. As fossil fuels contribute to climate change and as a result, the polar ice caps start to melt, the beautiful Arctic world that many creatures call home is not going to be around much longer. Not only are animals at risk from oil spills and water pollution, but by burning fossil fuels instead of using a renewable energy source, we are destroying their habitats and delicate ecosystems too. (6)
While this is a lot of doom and gloom, the good news is we already have a renewable energy source to switch to. Solar energy is a remarkable power that has the least negative impact on the environment and health. Unlike fossil fuels it doesn’t emit greenhouse gasses, it won’t cause air pollution or oil spills, and it is highly efficient as a sustainable and renewable energy source. With the ability to save consumers a lot of money on their energy bills, governments are now urging homeowners to install solar energy panels on their roofs. So why not become self-sufficient and combat climate change with this incredible renewable energy source and save the environment, mankind, and the animal kingdom while you’re at it!
No, it’s not illegal to go off the Florida grid entirely.
Florida statute says that if people are entirely self-sufficient, they can go off the grid altogether and split from the utility provider. To say somebody’s going off-grid would need four criteria.
Residential solar has grown by leaps and bounds in the U.S. over the past two decades, but let’s face it: Not everyone can have solar on their own roof.
As many as three-quarters of American households are unable to access rooftop solar — because they rent, or live in an apartment building, or a rooftop system is not affordable for them.
Enter community solar: a simple, even elegant concept. Neighbors who are unable to build their own solar systems can join together, build a larger and more cost-efficient solar array nearby, and use the energy it provides to power their homes. Like many simple concepts, however, the details can quickly become overwhelming.
In the first of a new series of explanatory articles, GTM will help you understand what community solar is and how it works.
There’s no national standard for what a community solar program looks like, and there are plenty of disagreements about what makes a program most effective. But there are some basic ideas and principles that most people agree on.
In a nutshell: Customers sign up or buy a share in a solar project, often through a community solar project developer or provider. Once constructed, the panels generate power, and subscribers receive credits that typically reduce their utility bills.
As long as there’s an active program where you live, signing up is generally pretty easy. In some states, you can sign up through your utility. In others, like Illinois, community solar providers sign up customers online.
Providers sometimes require a credit score, but that’s becoming less and less common. Solstice, a company that works with community solar developers to enhance customer experience, uses an alternative to FICO credit scores to determine a subscriber’s likelihood to pay their electricity bill, which opens the door to more customers who may not have top-tier credit scores. In 2018, the organization introduced a “no-risk” contract lasting just one year.
That kind of flexibility was once rare in the solar industry, which favors stable, long-term contracts that convince financiers of continued return on investment. But as community solar programs have become more commonplace — 19 states and Washington, D.C. now host some sort of program — many of those friendlier contract terms have become more accepted by the companies signing up customers.
The Coalition for Community Solar Access (CCSA), an industry trade group, generally shuns cancellation fees, as do many community solar companies such as Solstice, BlueWave Solar and Nexamp.
You should, yes. Most community solar providers, as well as CCSA, hold guaranteed savings over the utility bill as a standard for subscriptions. Savings can vary, though, from just a few percentage points up to 15 percent off of your average utility bill. Not all programs require customer savings.
How bills show the amount of money saved also varies. Generally, a community solar subscription offers customers “credits” off their utility bills. Those can show up either directly on the utility bill, a practice known as “consolidated billing,” or on a separate document sent by the community solar provider.
Opinions on the preferred method vary even among community solar advocates. Proponents of consolidated billing, including Washington, D.C.-based “digital utility” Arcadia, say it’s easier for customers to view and understand what’s going on when all of their electricity billing information is in one place.
Other companies, including Nexamp and CleanChoice Energy, favor two bills — one from the utility and another from the community solar subscription company — so a customer’s utility experience doesn’t change after they sign up for a program.
The market is comparatively small but growing quickly — and with a very long runway ahead.
At the end of 2019, there were around 2 gigawatts of community solar projects in operation in the United States, just a sliver of the country’s overall 76-gigawatt fleet of solar plants. The community solar market is currently concentrated in just a few states, led by Minnesota, Massachusetts and New York. But 2019 marked the third consecutive year of 500 megawatts of installations or more, according to the Solar Energy Industries Association, and new state markets such as Illinois and New Jersey are opening up.
As for the total number of households subscribed to community solar programs today, that’s hard to quantify. Some programs count both individual households and businesses as subscribers. But in Minnesota, which accounts for more than one-third of the total U.S. market, utility Xcel Energy reports about 16,700 unique residential subscribers for the state’s community solar program.
No. Forty states are home to at least one project, but not all of those states have active programs.
The programs that do exist can look quite different from one state to the next, varying significantly in size, scope and goals. The absence of a national standard for community solar has allowed state policymakers to tailor programs to their communities. The downside is that some programs are much more successful than others.
This patchwork has resulted in a pile-on in states where programs are enticing for companies and a lack of development where they’re not, regardless of access to sunshine.
California is one striking example. The state outranks all others in terms of population, and the Golden State is home to the country’s most sophisticated and mature solar market. But when it comes to community solar, California’s total installed is less than a fifth of that already constructed in Minnesota, a state best known for its freezing winters and general good-naturedness. (Full disclosure: The author is a native Minnesotan.)
California has a couple of state programs set up, but advocates say they’re overdesigned to the point of encumbering any real progress. By comparison, Massachusetts and Illinois opened programs that sparked a bonanza of development.
Demand was so significant in Massachusetts that utility National Grid said the added generation could jam up its transmission and distribution system. The utility began an extensive study to determine whether upgrades were needed. Developers criticized that study, saying it wasted valuable time in getting projects built and operational.
The tension in Massachusetts underscores persistent disagreements between community solar companies and investor-owned utilities on who should control community solar programs and what’s the best way to deliver value to customers.
Not exactly. Even if you subscribe, your utility will still deliver electricity to your home via the electric grid. And you may still just get one monthly electric bill from your utility, with the savings included. But subscribing supports the deployment of solar, with utilities paying for the power generated.
In some cases, utilities are spearheading community solar programs or projects on their own. Florida Power & Light, a subsidiary of big-time solar developer NextEra Energy, recently won approval for what it claims is the largest community solar program in the country.
Other utilities such as Xcel in Colorado offer options for customers to buy from individual utility-owned projects. The Sacramento Municipal Utility District’s SolarShares program was at the center of some community-solar drama in California last year. The Coalition for Community Solar Access advocates for a market that fosters ample third-party competition, rather than allowing investor-owned utilities to control the process.
Compared to other utility programs, Florida’s is on a different scale. Many community solar advocates have derided the state’s program as not qualifying as “real” community solar, in part because FP&L will build all of the projects in-house. After some back-and-forth, the utility offered some concessions and community solar advocates came back around to supporting the program.
PLP Carports are engineered and optimized to site-specific applications and PV solar installation. The modular structures feature a simplified design and integrated PV module mounting system designed to provide faster assembly rates and labor savings on every project. These solar support structures feature tilt angles that offer 0, 5, and 10 degree positions and an optional gasket sealing solution. PLP’s unique module clamping system offers 50 percent few components than traditional systems and has built-in 3⁄4″ spacing. This system offers 4-high or 7-high in portrait module mounting for a single row or double row car parking with built-in wire management channels.